International School History - European Schools - S5

S5 History

Last update - 04 May 2023

Official European School History 4-5 Syllabus: English, French, German.

Unit 6 - Nationalism in the 19th Century

1. Socio-economic factors – Industrial Revolution
2. Cultural factors – Nationalism
3. Political military factors – War


Socio-economic factors

As we have seen, the Industrial Revolution transformed the economic basis of society with enormous social consequences. The old ruling classes, the great land-owners were under pressure from the new rising middle classes – the industrialists – to reorganise the country politically. Giving the industrialists a say in how the country was run, would allow them to reorganise the country in the interests of industry. This meant encouraging free trade, allowing the free movement of people and ending feudal obligations and ties. It meant in brief, liberalism. In much of Europe, people were often either under the feudal control of small feudal states (as in Germany) or the feudal control of foreign empires (such as the Austrian Hapsburgs or Russian Romanovs).
 

 

A German cartoon of 1834 pokes fun at the large numbers of customs barriers in pre-united Germany

 

Either way, if capitalism was to develop, these inefficient economic systems would have to change. As Marx and Engels argued:

‘The necessary consequence of this was political centralisation. Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments, and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class-interest, one frontier, and one customs-tariff.’ Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: The Communist Manifesto (1848)
 

Above left the 'German' rail network in 1850, before unification and above right in 1870.


Cultural factors

And of course the development of industrial capitalism not only required the creation of nation states, capitalism also made it possible. By the late 19th century, subjects of monarch had become citizens with a democratic stake in the future direction of society. Individuals had lost their traditional peasant attachments and village loyalties as they were urbanised, educated and introduced to the ‘imagined communities’ and ‘invented traditions’ of the new nation states. They read their daily national newspapers in codified national languages, attended new schools with state directed national curricula, travelled across their nation on national railway networks and went to war waving newly invented flags (see Johnson's chart below from 1867), singing newly composed anthems.

In a time when the church and feudal ties were being weakened, nationalism, as the German philosopher Hegel pointed out, was a useful way giving people a sense of belonging and something to be loyal to. Nationalism became the cultural glue that bound society together.

Where the nation states did not yet exist, nationalists set out to create them. Popular movements like Young Italy and Young Ireland, inspired by Romantic philosophy and literature, established the principal characteristic features of the nation and campaigned politically for its creation. Romanticism was a reaction to the Enlightenment that emphasised not human rationalism, but rather human emotion. Romantic artists and poets contrasted the beauty of wild nature to the ugliness of the new cities. Romanticism and nationalism shared a longing for an idealised past.

   

Romantic nationalism and rational liberalism were therefore very different responses to the Industrial Revolution. Liberals and nationalists were only united in their opposition to feudalism. Where opposition from conservatives was fierce, revolution was said to provide the answer. In 1830 and 1848 throughout Europe, nationalists and liberals fought together establish their new political forms.

War

But whilst the revolutionaries remained fundamentally divided and weak national ambitions failed. In the end, the great nation building of the 19th century came about as a consequence of war. New nationalist sentiment and industrial expediency encouraged new nation states to be willed, but old fashioned power politics and military conquest made it possible for them to be created. Industrial development allowed Prussia to challenge the political hegemony of Austria and France in the wars of unification in the 1860s.

‘Since the treaties of Vienna, our frontiers have been ill-designed for a healthy body politic. Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided - that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849 - but by iron and blood.’ Otto von Bismarck (1862).

About I Contact Richard Jones-Nerzic