The Second World War can only
be described in superlatives; it was the most destructive war in
history causing more deaths, and involving more countries, than
any previous conflict. Six years of war had left Europe in a
state of utter devastation. Europe experienced ‘total war’ on a
terrifying scale, destroying lives not just where formal
military conflict occurred but throughout civilian populations
suffering bombing, occupation, persecution, exploitation and
extermination. Hopeful ideas of human progress and the
superiority of “European Civilisation” had already been battered
by the horrors of World War One, the economic disasters of the
1930s, and the political extremism that followed. The liberation
of the Nazi concentration camps exposed a further, barely
comprehendible depth of industrialised cruelty. The process of
rebuilding a broken continent would take place in the shadow of
these events.
“All historical work on the
events of this period will have to be pursued or considered in
relation to the events of Auschwitz....Here, all historicization
reaches its limits.” Saul Friedlander
(above) Jacob
Bronowski considers the industrial cruelty of Auschwitz
This era of ‘European Civil War 1914-91’, can be
said to have concluded with the revolutions in Eastern Europe
(1989), the reunification of Germany (1990) and the collapse of
the Soviet Union (1991). However, the social, political and
economic structures that emerged and have endured from the
post-war situation have done so in response to that defining
conflict.In particular, the European Union has its
origins in a shared desire to avoid any return to mass
unemployment, political extremism, German militarism, war and
revolution.
For the Western Allies, despite the alliance with Stalin, it was
also a ‘just war’, an unusually clear cut case of conflict
between Good and Evil and as such has served as an enduring
historical example, used by later politicians to rally their
nations, or to invoke when faced by new threats. The enormity of
the crimes committed in Germany’s name inevitably cast a shadow
over the remainder of the century. Spain’s limited involvement
in the War allowed Franco’s dictatorship to survive in isolation
from mainstream European developments. Globally, the War marked
a shift in power from the shattered nations of Western Europe to
the USA and the Soviet Union. The discredited, ruinous rivalry
of European states was replaced by a bipolar struggle between
the two new superpowers with an added ideological dimension.
Western European states would have to accept their diminished
roles, abandon their global empires and seek security under
America’s protection.
Few countries in Western Europe were able to avoid the traumas
of war in the years before 1945 and the two countries covered in
this section, Germany and Spain, represent the experiences of
defeat and neutrality. For others, (France, Belgium, the
Netherlands, Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway and Greece) invasion by Nazi
Germany and here allies was followed by occupation, exploitation, and
eventually, liberation. The United Kingdom, though undefeated,
endured the threat of invasion and the bombing of its cities.
For Italy, war brought defeat, invasion and civil war as Axis
and Allied forces fought across Italian territory. Spain,
Switzerland, Sweden, Portugal and Ireland maintained varying
degrees of precarious neutrality as war raged around them. It is
not to belittle the scale of these events to acknowledge that
the War in Western Europe was less destructive than in the East.
Nazi racial ideology could accommodate a degree of respect for
the peoples of Western Europe that was absent in the East where
the conflict was a ‘war of annihilation’, carried out with the
aim of destroying entire categories of people.
Total Deaths
%
of Pre-War Population
Military Deaths
Civilian Deaths
France
810,000
1.9%
340,000
470,000
United Kingdom
388,000
0.8%
326,000
62,000
Belgium
88,000
1.1%
76,000
12,000
Italy
410,000
0.9%
330,000
80,000
Germany
6,850,000
9.5%
3,250,000
3,600,000
Soviet Union
20,600,000
10.4%
13,600,000
7,000,000
Poland
6,123,000
17.2%
123,000
6,000,000
Yugoslavia
1,706,000
10.9%
N/A
N/A
Source:
BBC
Statistics for World War Two casualties are
difficult to verify and vary from source to source.
These figures are taken from a BBC website and the
author acknowledges that they can only be
approximate. Discussion Point: • Why is difficult
for historians to agree on accurate statistics of
World War Two casualties? • What do the statistics
tell you about War as experienced in Eastern and
Western Europe?
What were the war aims?
Great Britain and France declared war on Germany on 3rd
September 1939 following the German invasion of Poland. The
Western Allies’ attempts at appeasement; using diplomacy,
compromise, and conceding to Hitler’s demands in order to
maintain peace in Europe had ended in failure and revealed how
seriously they had misunderstood Hitler, a leader whose
reasoning was of a radically different nature. Hitler’s aims,
as he had made clear, were to undo the Treaty of Versailles, to
establish Germany’s domination of Europe, to destroy communism,
to carry out a race-war against non-Aryans and to create
Lebensraumfor the German people guaranteed by the
power of the “Thousand Year Reich”. Spain stood apart
from Europe in 1939. After three years of devastating civil
war, Spain had been economically ruined and socially ripped
apart. The success of the Nationalists left General Francisco
Franco as dictator of Spain, a position he was to consolidate
with characteristic brutality throughout the duration of the
Second World War. As the Second World War broke out Franco had a
natural inclination to side with the fascist dictatorships whose
aid had been so important to his success in the Civil War but he
proceeded with caution. Franco may have had imperialist
ambitions for British Gibraltar and French North Africa for ‘he
cherished hopes of empire on the cheap, on the coat-tails of
Hitler’ (Preston, Franco: 326) but his overarching concern was
always to strengthen his own domestic position.
What
were the consequences of Germany’s early successes?
German forces defeated Poland
within weeks. The
Blitzkrieg tactics overwhelmed the Polish Army. The Soviet
Union subsequently invaded the Eastern half of Poland as agreed
in a secret deal with Germany. Poland’s geographical isolation
from Britain and France meant that there was no practical
assistance to be offered. Having secured his Eastern flank,
Hitler’s attention turned to Western Europe.
In May 1940, German troops
attacked the Netherlands, Belgium and France. The British Army
was forced to abandon the Continent. As the German advance
briefly paused, over 300,000 British and French troops were
rescued from the beaches at Dunkirk and taken to Britain to
fight another day. As German troops closed in on Paris, the
British and French governments discussed the idea of uniting
their nations in a Franco-British Union to sustain ‘France’ even
through military defeat. This embryonic proposal of European
union came to nothing and the French Government collapsed soon
after. General de Gaulle escaped to London and assumed
leadership of the ‘Free French’; those who had escaped and those
who were determined to continue the struggle from France’s
overseas territories. Marshal Petain stayed in France as head of
a Nazi controlled puppet state which was to be economically
exploited for the German war effort and from which the Jewish
population would be transported to concentration camps.
Suspicions remained between
Germany’s enemies. De Gaulle felt that the RAF could have
provided more planes for the defence of France, but Churchill
would not risk losing these aircraft that would be vital to the
defence of Britain. By acting cautiously in case France should
be defeated did Churchill actually guarantee that it did?
Further ill feeling arose from Royal Navy attacks on the French
Mediterranean Fleet, the loyalties of which were uncertain. To
the British this was a military necessity to prevent the ships
falling into enemy hands but the incident exposed the strain put
on the Allies by their failures against Germany. Fruitless
Anglo-French attempts at unity, French ingratitude, suspected
British lack of commitment to continental allies, mutual
incomprehension; these themes were to resurface in the post-War
era as a new Western Europe took shape. In July 1940, Hitler
paused. Tentative offers of peace were discussed. Records of
British Cabinet meetings show that there was some support for
the idea that Hitler could be appeased once more. It fell to
Churchill to clarify the situation.
Discussion Point
“I have thought carefully in
these last days whether it was part of my duties to
consider entering into negotiations with That Man.
But it was idle to think that, if we tried to make
peace now, we should get better terms than if we
fought it out...The Germans would demand our
fleet...and much else. We would become a slave
state, though a British Government which would be
Hitler’s puppet would be set up....And I am
convinced that every man of you would rise up and
tear me down from my place if I were for one moment
to contemplate ... surrender. If this long island
story of ours is to end at last, let it end when
each one of us lies choking in his own blood upon
the ground.”
Churchill, speaking to the British Cabinet, 28th
May 1940
What kind of demands do you think
Hitler could have made in return for peace?
(above) The BBC's Andrew
Marr on the significance of May 1940 in Britain-
More
Hitler made preparations for
Operation Sealion; the German plan to invade Britain. To
succeed, Germany would first have to achieve air superiority by
destroying the fighter planes of the Royal Air Force. The Battle
of Britain was a decisive defeat for Hitler, the first of the
War. Throughout August and September, 1940, the two air forces
fought each other over Southern England until German losses
became unsustainable and the invasion of Britain was postponed.
This victory was, in Churchill’s phrase, Britain’s “finest
hour”, achieved by pilots from Britain, the British Empire,
Poland, Czechoslovakia, France and other Allied nations. The
strategic implications of victory were crucial as Britain’s
survival provided the Allies with an impregnable base beyond the
reach of Germany’s superior land forces. From this base the
Allies could develop their air power to eventually achieve air
supremacy in Western Europe. The victory also provided hope for
the people of occupied Europe and bought time to develop the
Alliance that would defeat Hitler.
The two air forces continued
to bomb each other’s cities; German attacks on civilian targets
were held up as examples of Nazi barbarism, though the British
were also bombing civilian targets in Germany. By the final year
of the War, Germany was suffering raids on a devastating scale.
Hundreds of thousands of innocents were killed in the
destruction of Cologne, Hamburg, Dresden and other cities. Of
the approximately 60,000 British civilian victims of German
bombing raids, 9,000 were killed in the final year of the War by
missiles launched from Germany. These unmanned weapons were
totally indiscriminate – they were simply aimed at London.
Whether or not the bombing of cities could destroy an enemy’s
morale and his will to continue the War is uncertain; British
propagandists made much of London’s ability to “take it”,
disregarding the possibility that German cities might be able to
“take it” too. The destruction of factories could temporarily
disrupt production but required greater accuracy than was
achievable.
In June 1941, Hitler launched
Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union. Over 3
million German soldiers participated in what was the largest
military assault in history. They were assisted by smaller
contingents from Romania, Hungary and Italy. Despite Spain’s
declared neutrality, General Franco agreed to the deployment of
20,000 Spanish troops, the Falange shirted ‘Blue Division’ on
the condition that they were used only against the Soviet Union
and not in Western Europe. Within months this invasion force had
advanced hundreds of kilometres, vastly extending the territory
of German controlled Europe. Approximately 5.5 million Soviet
soldiers were taken prisoner by the Germans during the War and
of these 3.3 million died, or were murdered, in captivity.
However, Germany was unable to
achieve victory; the Soviets were able to concede territory in
order to buy time. Factories were moved east beyond the range of
German planes and production steadily increased. In an ever more
destructive war of attrition the Soviets could replace troop
losses at a rate the Germans could not match. During the first
winter of the campaign the Soviets halted the German advance and
over the following year fought bitterly to turn back the
invaders. Following the devastating German defeat at Stalingrad
in January 1943, the Red Army began to drive the Germans back in
a series of emphatic victories. 75% of Germany’s total war
casualties occurred on the Eastern Front where all restraints
were abandoned in what had become a war of annihilation.
Meanwhile, the United States
had entered the War, following the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbour in December, 1941. Germany had declared war on the US
soon after. The defeat of German and Italian forces in North
Africa was followed by the Allied invasion of Italy beginning in
July, 1943. A vast invasion force of Allied troops from the
USA, Britain, Canada and other allied nations gathered in
southern England. On June 6th, 1944, (D-Day) these
troops landed in France opening another front against Germany.
Hitler’s Empire was now being squeezed on three sides.
Discussion Point: Turning Points?
“So, we have won after all.”
Churchill’s
diary entry, December 1941 after the Japanese attack
on Pearl Harbour drew the USA into the War.
Churchill’s comment identifies
the entry of America into the war as a crucial
event. Was it the most significant turning point?
What other events of the War could be described as
key turning points?
Why was Germany defeated?
Hitler’s campaigns against
Britain and the Soviet Union and his declaration of war against
USA (see above) exposed Germany to an overwhelming coalition of
enemies against whom the traditional Blitzkrieg tactics could
not be applied. Island Britain, having defeated the Luftwaffe
was safe from German tanks. The Soviets could concede territory,
gather strength and expose the over-extended German supply
lines. The USA could direct its industrial power to war
production, supply its allies with equipment and eventually open
a second front in Western Europe.
This economic mismatch was
compounded by Germany’s comparatively slow economic mobilisation,
failing to match Britain’s production of war material in the
first years of the War. This inefficiency was masked by the
outstanding performance of the German military in the Blitzkrieg
attacks on Poland and France and by Reichsmarschall Hermann
Goering’s inflated reports of economic progress. Evidence
suggests that Hitler was surprised by Britain and France’s
willingness to go to war over Poland and had not anticipated
total war – the logical outcome of Nazism – until the mid 1940s,
by which time Germany would have consolidated the core of a new
Empire at the expense of its Eastern neighbours and opened up a
greater military lead. Hitler’s gambler’s logic and impatience
with economic realities led Germany prematurely into global
conflict. Albert Speer, Reich Minister for Armaments and
Production (1942-45) brought greater organisation and
productivity after 1942 but by then Germany was facing an
alliance of Britain, the USA and the Soviet Union. Speer’s
improvements could not compensate for this strategic
disadvantage as Germany was subjected to bombing by superior air
forces from East and West while Russian and American factories
lay beyond its reach.
Tanks and Aircraft Production
1940-45
Germany
Soviet Union
USA
Tanks
Aircraft
Tanks
Aircraft
Tanks
Aircraft
1940
1,643
10,826
2,794
10,565
331
12,084
1941
3,790
11,776
6,590
15,735
4,052
26,277
1942
6,180
15,556
24,446
25,436
24,997
47,836
1943
12,063
25,527
24,089
34,845
29,497
85,898
1944
19,002
39,807
28,963
40,246
17,565
96,318
1945
3,932
7,544
15,419
20,052
11,968
49,761
Source: N. Davies,
Europe at War, London, 2006, Pan Macmillan, p.33-35
Hitler held ultimate
responsibility for military and political decisions during the
War. The successes of 1939-41convinced him of his own
infallibility and he became less willing to listen to the advice
of his Generals. As the limitations of Blitzkrieg were exposed
in Russia, Hitler stubbornly insisted on a policy of no
retreats, carelessly sacrificing troops’ lives. As the long term
outlook worsened Hitler chose to ignore strategy and instead
interfered with decisions at a tactical level, denying local
commanders of any initiative in battle. Those close to Hitler,
describe a man whose physical and mental health deteriorated
rapidly and yet who remained convinced of his historic destiny.
“Hitler’s detachment from reality broke
new bounds in the last war years. His self-imposed isolation in
his remote headquarters...intensely magnified his tendency to
exclude unpalatable reality in favour of an illusory world in
which ‘will’ always triumphed”
I. Kershaw,
Hitler, Profiles in Power.
The Nazi project to establish
a ‘New Order’ in Europe foundered on its own contradictions.
Civilian life in those areas under German occupation was often
brutal and the Nazis spurned opportunities to co-operate with
anti-Soviet nationalists in Ukraine and the Baltic States. Any
advantage that could have been gained from nurturing alliances
within occupied areas, particularly in Eastern Europe, was at
odds with Nazi racial ideology which, in contrast to Communism,
held most of mankind to be beyond redemption. The extraordinary
levels of cruelty forced people to resist, made great demands on
resources and damaged the overall war effort. Ultimately, all
the Nazis could offer was war without end and war as an end in
itself. As these contradictions unraveled in the defeats of
1944-45, support for the War collapsed. As the Soviet Army
entered German territory from the East, its soldiers sought
revenge for the atrocities carried out in Russia by the German
Army in the preceding years. Rape and pillage were widespread
and tacitly condoned. Stalin himself asked if it was not
possible to “...understand the soldier who has gone through
blood and fire and death, if he has fun with a woman or takes a
trifle?” The Nazis used the reports of mass rape and murder
to urge citizens to fight to the end, though many thousands
preferred to flee to the west where the British and Americans
were seen as more benevolent invaders. Hitler himself chose
suicide over the humiliation of capture. By May 1945, the
Western Allies had advanced deep into Germany, Berlin was
captured by the Red Army and victory was achieved.
Was World War Two a ‘Total
War’?
“Are you the German people
determined, if the Fuhrer orders it, to work ten,
twelve and, if necessary fourteen and sixteen hours
a day and to give your utmost for victory? ..... I
ask you: Do you want total war? Do you want it, if
necessary more total and more radical than we can
imagine it even today? (Loud cries of ‘Yes!’ and
applause)...Let the nation arise! Let the storm
break!” Extract from Goebbels’ ‘Total War’ speech,
February, 1943
World War Two is commonly
regarded as an example of “Total War” in terms of extent,
intensity, lack of restraints and far-reaching social change.
Governments assumed powers of control over citizens and
economies in the pursuit of military victory and advances in
military technology gave combatants the power to attack the
enemy’s citizens and economy. The killing of enemy civilians
became not simply a by-product of war but an aim in itself. As
historian, Ian Beckett has noted, “The
inescapable logic of the attempt to create a war economy was the
recognition that a society that sustained a war became as much a
legitimate target for military action as an army that waged war
on its behalf.”Quoted in Total War and Historical
Change, A. Marwick et al, P.28
Activity:
Complete the following table
World War II and Total War
World War Two
Intensity (very intense battles,
frequency of battles, high casualty figures, massive
deployment of men and resources
Extent (number of participants,
geographical extent, duration)
Operation Barbarossa: battles of
Byelorussia, Smolensk & Moscow 1941
1,582,000
Stalingrad 1942-3
973,000
Siege of Leningrad 1941-4
900,000
Kiev 1941
657,000
Operation Bagration (Soviet Offensive
1944)
450,000
Kursk 1943
325,000
Berlin 1945
250,000
French Campaign 1940
185,000
Operation Overlord (France) 1944
132,000
Budapest 1944-5
130,000
Polish Campaign 1939
80,000
Battle of the Bulge (Belgium) 1944
38,000
Warsaw Rising 1944
excluding civilians
30,000
Operation Market Garden (Netherlands)
1944
16,000
Battle of El Alamein (North Africa)
1942
4,650
Source: N. Davies, Europe
at War, Pan Books, London, 2007, p.25
In what ways was War in
Western Europe less ‘total’ than in the East?
What do the statistics
reveal about the War in Eastern Europe compared with Western
Europe?