‘The teoria de caudillaje
was a defining contour of the Franco regime, and with it came a
flourishing personality cult… this bureaucratic state learned much from
the economic policy of Fascist Italy. These lessons also included
autarky, the Labour Charter establishing rights and duties of workers
(1938), the 'Battle for Wheat' and the INI, a source of state investment
for industry (1941). The Falangist Seccion Femenina… 're-educated' women
in their traditional roles, analagous to the Nazi Kinder, Kirche, Kuche…
Franco regime banned not only divorce but, along with all Catholic
countries, contraception. As in Mussolini's Italy and the Third Reich,
awards were given as incentive to produce large families… Through the
voluntary Youth Front founded in 1940 (Pelayos aged 7-10, Flechas 11-14,
Cadetes 15-18) Falangists instilled political doctrine… [and] occupied
top positions in the Franco propaganda machine, press, radio, film,
theatre, and … orchestrated parades and rallies affirming mass support
for the Caudillo with their fascist salute and conspicuous blue shirts.
(Andrew Forrest, The Spanish Civil War p.116, p.118 )
‘Falangists never played a
major role in the new state. Most of the key leaders of the Falange did
not survive the Civil War, and Franco moved quickly to subordinate the
fascist party, merging it as well as more conservative and traditional
political forces into the broader and vaguer National Movement under his
direct control…Thus, while there was a definite fascist element during
the first decade of Franco's rule, most analysts have concluded that
early Francoism can more accurately be described as semifascist.` (Eric
Solsten and Sandra W. Meditz, editors. Spain: A Country Study.
Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1988. http://countrystudies.us/spain/)
‘First, it must be conceded
that Franco was a very different sort of man from Hitler or Mussolini.
They were first and foremost politicians, but he was pre-eminently a
soldier… He was never a member of any political party, and thus there
was no equivalent of the Nazis or the Fascists in Spain. The Falange, as
we have seen, was the nearest Spain came to possessing a fascist party,
but Franco took actions to limit its importance - and members of the
Falange responded in 1940 with an assassination attempt.’ (Robert
Pearce - Fascism and Nazism Hodder p.86)
‘Franco ruled Spain as the
regent of a Conservative Monarchy, like Admiral Horthy in Hungary. Both
Franco and Salazar – in differing degrees – were allies of the Catholic
Church. During the civil war, in order to humour his fascist backers,
Franco uttered fascist slogans and played up the Falange. But at best he
was half-hearted, as the German ambassador repeatedly complained.’ (Fascism
in Europe – S J Woolf Taylor & Francis, 1981 p.35)
Franco was not a fascist.
There is an element of revolutionary politics in fascism, of wanting to
provoke a dramatic change in society. That was not Franco’s intention:
on the contrary, he wanted to preserve Spain from change… the debate as
to whether Franco was a fascist is in many ways irrelevant, since the
denial of Franco’s fascism has often been an essential part of attempts
to legitimise his actions. The fact remains that his brutality matched
or even exceeded that of Mussolini’ (Franco and the Spanish Civil
War - Filipe Ribeiro De Meneses – Routledge 2001 p87)
‘…in the last twenty years,
scholars have dwelt on the fact that Francoism was not
Hitlerism…resulting in an increasingly widespread consensus that
Francoism was never really fascism …Such an approach is
understandable and unfortunate… An eagerness to exonerate the Franco
regime from the taint of fascism can go with a readiness to forget that,
after coming to power through a civil war which claimed hundreds of
thousands of lives and forced hundreds of thousands more into exile, the
dictatorship executed at least quarter of a million people, maintained
concentration camps and labour battalions, and sent troops to fight for
Hitler on the Russian front…. the confident exclusion…of the Franco
regime from a discussion of fascism cold only be justified if fascism is
taken to be synonymous with Nazism at its most extreme, complete with
racialistic bestiality. Such a view, since it leads logically to the
suggestion that Mussolini’s Italy was not really fascist, is so rigid as
to be useless.’ (The politics of revenge - Paul Preston Routledge, 1995
pp10-11)
‘In spite of the Fascist
trimmings of the early years—the goose-step and the Fascist salute—Francoism
was not a totalitarian regime. It was a conservative, Catholic,
authoritarian system, its original corporatist features modified over
time. It came to have none of the characteristics of a totalitarian
state: no single party parallel to the state administration; after the
early years, no successful attempt at mass mobilization.’ (Raymond
Carr - Modern Spain 1875-1980, OUP 1980 p.165)
‘The word ‘Fascism’ is
almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even
more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers,
shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting,
bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi,
Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels,
astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else… almost any English
person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’. That is about as
near to a definition as this much-abused word has come.’ (George
Orwell - ‘What is Fascism?’ Tribune 1944.
http://orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc)
Activity
Table – Was Franco a Fascist?
Characteristics of a Fascist state
Franco’s
Spain?
One party
state with leadership cult
A dominant
fascist party with radical ideology for change
Anti-socialist and anti-liberal
Social
policies that reinforce traditional patriarchal values
Nationalistic
and militaristic with imperial ambitions
Strict
ideological control over the media and education system
Persecution
of religious groups and accommodation with the Catholic
Church
Fascist
economic policies e.g. promotion of autarky
Copy and complete the
table ‘was Franco a fascist?’ In order to produce a satisfactory
table, you will need to research beyond the information provided in
this chapter.
Compare and contrast
the views of two recent historians on Franco, Paul Preston and
Filipe Ribeiro De Meneses. To what extent do they actually disagree
with each other?
Franco ruled Spain
for nearly 40 years. Why does this make it more difficult to
conclude whether he was a fascist or not?
In 1944 the English
writer George Orwell wrote that the word fascism was ‘entirely
meaningless’. Does the word have any meaning or use in today’s
world?